Vulpes cana (carnivore)
Mass: 1.2 kg based on Cunningham and Howarth 2002 and Smith et al. 2003
Diet: insectivore-frugivore based on Geffen et al. 1992; invertivore-frugivore based on Cunningham and Howarth 2002
Abundance: 0.51 to 2.30%
Latitudinal range: 16.6° to 17.2°Habitats: desert/xeric shrubland (1), tropical/subtropical dry broadleaf forest (1)
Found in two samples
Oman: Southwest Dhofar Mountains
Yemen: Hawf
Size measurements:
♀ body mass | 1442 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 955 g | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 1245 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 1200 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 955 g | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1442 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1245 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 950 g | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1450 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1180 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1280 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1200 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1180 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1248 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ body mass | 1242 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ body mass | 1242 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1248 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1550 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1000 g | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1500 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1280 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 89 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 84 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 89 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 84 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 82 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 88 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 82 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 80 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 80 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 82 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 95 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 83 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 88 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 99 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 88 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 95 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 97 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 93 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 98 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 105 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 105 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 98 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 95 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 98 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 94 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 317 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 300 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 332 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 317 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 300 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 332 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 330 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 310 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 330 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 350 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 328 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 307 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 345 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 326 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 350 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 307 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 345 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 350 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 326 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 330 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 329 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 657 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 735 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 762 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 710 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 722 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 657 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 735 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 762 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 710 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 680 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 725 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 715 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 725 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 747 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 800 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 736 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 750 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 747 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 800 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 750 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 736 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 760 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 730 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 700 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 725 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
See also Vulpes, Vulpes alopecoides, Vulpes bengalensis, Vulpes chama, Vulpes corsac, Vulpes ferrilata, Vulpes galaticus, Vulpes lagopus, Vulpes macrotis, Vulpes rueppellii, Vulpes sp., Vulpes stenognathus, Vulpes velox, Vulpes vulpes, Vulpes zerda